The problem
A claim can lose its date, source, and context by the time it reaches your feed.
Question. Verify. Understand.
There's more to a post than meets the eye.
A viral video, a headline or a forwarded message can tell only part of the story. TruthBubble helps you examine the facts, understand the context and explore the evidence for yourself.
Website checks find related published fact-checks. Broader analysis is available only in selected private Android beta workflows.
EvidenceContextSources
TruthBubble in action
Play with sound
What TruthBubble does
The website checker starts with a text claim. Selected media workflows are being tested in Android early access.
The result
Compare the original claims and ratings in any related published fact-checks returned.
Our founding philosophy
The hardest claims to question are often the ones we already believe.
We tend to examine information that challenges our views more carefully than information that reinforces them. TruthBubble encourages us to approach both with the same curiosity, evidence and standards.
Question what you believe. Not just what you doubt.
Privacy stays part of the product, not a footnote.
TruthBubble is designed for user-chosen checks. The goal is to help you inspect a claim, not silently watch everything you do.
Check a claim
Try the first step yourself.
Paste one clear statement to look for related published fact-checks and source links. You can open each review and see what it covered.
A fuller picture
More than true or false.
A statement can be factually correct and still create the wrong impression. Sometimes the problem is what gets left out, how facts are compared, or the conclusion someone draws from them. TruthBubble helps examine these differences instead of reducing every story to a simple yes or no.
The website checker currently returns related published fact-checks; it does not assign an independent TruthBubble verdict or run this broader assessment framework.
Supported
The central factual claim is supported by strong available evidence.
Mostly Supported
The main claim holds up, although some details need correction or qualification.
Partly Supported
Some important parts are supported, while others are incorrect, unsupported or unresolved.
Misleading
The presentation creates a materially inaccurate impression through omissions, implications or selective context.
False
Strong evidence contradicts the central factual claim.
Unsubstantiated
The available investigation does not establish sufficient support for the claim.
Insufficient Evidence
The evidence or research coverage is not sufficient for a dependable conclusion.
Five separate assessment dimensions
The factual verdict addresses checkable claims. The other dimensions describe context, reasoning, communication and safety separately.
Explore Our Method01
Factual verdict
What does the available evidence establish about the claim?
02
Framing and context
Are important facts missing, selectively presented or compared in a misleading way?
03
Inference and reasoning
Does the conclusion actually follow from the evidence?
04
Tone and communication
How does the wording or presentation influence the message?
05
Safety
Does the material contain concerning signals that require additional attention?
“Not fact-checkable” is an intake category for content without a material verifiable factual assertion, not an overall factual verdict.
The product idea
A little more room to think.
When a post feels urgent or too simple, it can help to pause. TruthBubble brings the claim, context and sources into view so you can decide what the evidence means.
The website checker accepts a text claim and looks for related public fact-checks. Android is in private early access, and supported content flows depend on the current test build.
Read the explanation, open the sources, and decide what the evidence means for yourself.
Android beta screen previews. Available features can vary by approved test build.
How it works
Three steps, one readable result.
The website checker currently works with text claims and related public fact-check reviews. Other content flows depend on the Android beta build and are not available through every route yet.
01
Share what you want checked
Submit a text claim to the website checker, or request Android beta access for supported content flows.
02
We examine the evidence
The website checker looks for related public reviews and source links. Android workflows are tested with selected content and may vary by build.
03
Compare the published reviews
Read each source’s reviewed claim and original rating. A missing public match does not mean a claim is false or that a full investigation was performed.
Availability
Know what you can use today.
Website text checks are available now. Android access is by request; browser and iOS support remain planned.
Available now
Website claim checker
Enter a text claim to look for related public fact-checks. Results and source links depend on available coverage.
Check a ClaimPrivate beta
Android access by request
Requests are reviewed. If approved, the private APK access link is sent by email. Available content flows depend on the current test build.
Get Early AccessPlanned
Browser and iOS support
Browser extensions, iOS, and direct connections to social platforms are not currently available. Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, and X are examples of places claims may appear, not integrations or endorsements.
What matters in a check
Careful claims. Useful context.
The website checker focuses on available public reviews. TruthBubble's method keeps factual verdicts distinct from context, reasoning, and communication style.
Claims, not just captions
Focus a check on a factual statement rather than treating an entire post as one claim.
Sources you can explore
Open related public fact-checks and source links returned by the website checker.
Context that matters
The method treats missing context, reasoning, and communication style as separate from factual accuracy.
Clear about uncertainty
A missing public match is not proof a claim is false. Results describe the sources available to that check.
A careful look at public creator records.
Creator Profiles are a planned preview. There are no published creator ratings yet; any future summaries will need documented checks and clear limits.
How to read a result
Compare the reviews behind a search result.
The website search does not assign a TruthBubble verdict. It lists related published fact-checks so you can compare each source's original claim and rating.
Read Our MethodThe claim
What was submitted for review.
The evidence
Source links and what they reviewed.
The limits
Missing data stays visible.
Use a check thoughtfully
A useful starting point, not the last word.
The result should help you make up your own mind. Take a moment to read the reasoning and inspect the evidence behind it.
- 01
Read the explanation
The label is only a summary. The claim and reasoning show what was actually assessed.
- 02
Open the sources
Follow the references and compare them with the original post.
- 03
Leave room for updates
Evidence can change. A correction or new source may change the assessment.
FAQ
Straight answers, no overpromising.
TruthBubble is still early. The website should be honest about what exists, what is planned, and where automated checks have limits.
What can I use today?
The website checker accepts a text claim and looks for related public fact-checks. Android is in private early access; requests are reviewed and approved testers receive an APK link by email.
Can it check videos and screenshots?
The website checker currently accepts text claims. Selected post, screenshot, and video workflows are part of Android beta testing and may vary by test build.
Will every claim get a true or false answer?
No. The website currently searches for related published fact-checks and shows their original ratings. TruthBubble’s separate independent assessment framework defines seven factual verdicts, but the website search does not assign one to your claim.
Does a plausible but unproven inference mean misinformation?
No. An interpretation can be reasonable without conclusive proof. TruthBubble considers the evidence, alternative explanations, and whether the conclusion is proportionate to what is known.
Does TruthBubble rate creators?
Creator Profiles are a planned feature. The directory is not yet comprehensive, and we do not assign creators numerical reputation scores. Any future summaries would need documented reviews, transparent sampling, corrections, and clear coverage limits.
Can I request a correction?
You can email the result and relevant evidence through the Contact page. This is a general contact route, not a dedicated correction or appeal process; no review, response time, or outcome is guaranteed.
Does TruthBubble replace human judgment?
No. The website searches for related published reviews; it does not create an independent finding. AI-assisted automation contributes materially to supported Android beta assessments, and this website does not claim every such assessment receives individual human review. Use the sources and your judgment, especially for important decisions.
Help shape the first public release.
Android access is currently private. Requests are reviewed; if approved, you’ll receive the APK access link by email. Use the website checker for text claims today.
Browser and iOS support remain planned; direct social-platform connections are not available.